Skip to main content

Data Transferability

Marine renewable energy (MRE) is an emerging industry hampered by high monitoring costs and extended timelines associated with consenting/permitting (hereafter consenting). Through interactions with US regulators and the international MRE community, OES-Environmental has developed a pathway to risk retirement to inform a set of solutions that could allow regulators to consent and license MRE devices more readily than is currently available.

A key aspect of using the risk retirement process is ensuring that datasets from consented projects are readily available and catalogued so that the new projects can leverage or learn from previous data collection efforts. 

This process, termed “data transferability”, consists of four components, shown graphically in Figure 1:

  1. Data transferability framework ‒ brings together datasets in an organized fashion, compares the applicability of each dataset for use in other locations, and guides the process of data transfer.
  2. Data collection consistency table ‒ provides preferred measurement methods or processes, reporting units, and the most common methods of analysis or interpretation/use of data.
  3. Monitoring datasets discoverability matrix ‒ allows a practitioner to discover datasets based on the approach presented in the framework.
  4. Best management practices ‒ consists of four best management practices (BMPs) that help guide data transferability and collection consistency.

Data Transferability Figure

Figure 1. Relationship of the four components of the data transferability process.

OES-Environmental has engaged with regulators, technical experts, and other members of the MRE community through surveys, workshops, and direct interactions to receive feedback throughout the development of the data transferability process. More information, including links to relevant workshop presentations, recordings, and reports can be found below in the Outreach & Engagement section.

Additional information on the components of the data transferability process can also be found in the following documents:


Data Transferability Framework

Under OES-Environmental, a data transferability framework has been developed that outlines and guides the process for data transfer. The framework is described in detail in Data Transferability and Collection Consistency in Marine Renewable Energy: An Update to the 2018 Report.

The following guidelines for transferability describe the approach to apply the framework to environmental interactions in a hierarchy, ranging from necessary to desirable but not necessary for transferability (Figure 2).

Guidelines for Transferability

Figure 2. Guidelines for transferability.

The steps shown in the figure above to consider for transferring data from a previous project to a new project include:

Step 1. Characterize the environmental interaction of the future project by examining the stressor, site conditions, MRE technology type, and receptor. 

Stressor - Receptor - Site Condition - Technology Type with arrow from left to right

Figure 3. Characterizing the interaction.

Step 2. Compare the project size. Data will best be transferred among projects with small numbers of devices, or among small arrays, or among large commercial arrays.

Step 3. Compare the receptor species. A similar receptor group is necessary, but the species may differ.

Step 4. Compare the particular type of MRE technology (e.g., an oscillating water column vs. a point absorber for types of wave energy devices).

Step 5. Compare the tidal or wave energy resource climate (e.g., current speed or directionality).

The framework has been developed to provide a background against which discussions with regulators can proceed to enhance the understanding of the limits of transferability. The framework can also facilitate initial consenting discussions between developers and regulators to determine data collection and monitoring efforts needed to consent a project.
 


Data Collection Consistency

MRE is an international industry with consenting processes and research norms that differ among countries, regions, and research and commercial data collection efforts. It would be extremely difficult to enforce the use of specific protocols or instruments to collect all data for pre- or post-installation monitoring. However, encouraging the use of consistent data collection processes and reporting units for monitoring data could increase confidence in the transfer of data from already consented projects to future projects. The data collection consistency table below (Table 1) provides preferred measurement methods or processes, reporting units, and the most common methods of analysis or interpretation/use of data. While the use of this table and consistent approaches to data collection is encouraged and can be helpful, it should not be considered as required for transferability or informing consenting for new projects. 

Table 1. Data collection consistency table. This table will be reviewed and updated by OES-Environmental in 2026.

Stressor Process or Measurement Tool Reporting Unit Analysis or Interpretation
Collision Risk

Sensors include:

  • Active acoustic only
  • Active acoustic + video
  • Other
  • Number of visible targets in field of view
  • Number of collisions
Number of collisions or close interactions of animals with turbines to validate collision risk models
Underwater Noise
  • Fixed or floating hydrophones
  • Methodologies provided by IEC 62600-40

Amplitude:

  • dB re 1 μPa

Frequency:

  • Broadband
  • Specific frequencies
Sound outputs compared to regulatory action levels. Generally reported as broadband noise.
Electromagnetic Fields (EMF)

Source:

  • Cable (shielded or unshielded)
  • Other
  • AC or DC
  • Voltage
  • Amplitude
Measured EMF levels to validate existing EMF models around cables
Habitat Change
  • Underwater mapping with sonar video
  • Habitat characterization from mapping existing maps
  • Area of habitat altered, specific for each habitat type
Compare potential changes in habitat to maps of rare and important habitats to determine if they are likely to be harmed.
Displacement/Barrier Effect

Population estimates by:

  • Human observers
  • Passive or active acoustic monitoring
  • Video
  • Population estimates for species under special protection
  • Validation of population models
  • Estimates of jeopardy
  • Loss of species for vulnerable populations
Changes in Flow
  • Numerical modeling, with or without field data validation
  • No units.
  • Indication of data sets used for validation, if any.
Data collected around arrays to validate models.



Monitoring Datasets Discoverability Matrix

The Monitoring Datasets Discoverability Matrix classifies monitoring datasets from already consented projects for six stressors (collision, underwater noise, electromagnetic fields, habitat change, displacement, oceanographic systems). The online tool allows regulators and/or developers to discover datasets that can be transferred and used for consenting future projects.

Monitoring Datasets Discoverability Matrix


Best Management Practices

Best management practices (BMPs) for data transferability were developed to help guide the implementation of the data transferability process. The BMPs are practical steps that address the use of data from previous projects for consenting new MRE projects.

Table 2. Best management practices for data transferability, including the purpose of each BMP and the interested parties who would benefit from their use.

Best Management Practices Purpose Interested Parties
BMP 1: Meet the necessary minimum requirements to be considered for data transfer. Ensure minimum thresholds including using same interactions, are met for transferring data. Regulators, as well as MRE device developers and consultants.
BMP 2: Determine likely datasets that meet data consistency needs and quality assurance requirements. Ensure methods used to collect/analyze data are compatible and will help to determine the validity of comparing the datasets. Regulators, as well as MRE device developers and consultants.
BMP 3: Use models in conjunction with and/or in place of datasets. Encourages the use of numerical models to simulate interactions. Researchers, consultants, regulators.
BMP 4: Provide context and perspective for datasets to be transferred. Encourages the use of available and pertinent
datasets to enhance the interpretation of data and information.
Device developers, consultants, regulators, researchers.


Outreach & Engagement

The activities and timeline for developing and sharing the data transferability process with MRE regulators, developers, researchers, and other members of the MRE community are shown below. Since 2020, outreach and development efforts on data transferability have been incorporated into efforts on risk retirement. More information on these efforts are available on the Risk Retirement Outreach & Engagement page.

2024

2020

2019

2018 

​​2017