The precautionary principle and wind-farm planning: data scarcity does not imply absence of effects

Journal Article

Title: The precautionary principle and wind-farm planning: data scarcity does not imply absence of effects
Publication Date:
August 01, 2010
Journal: Biological Conservation
Volume: 143
Issue: 8
Pages: 1829-1830
Publisher: Elsevier
Receptor:
Interactions:

Document Access

Website: External Link

Citation

Carrete, M.; Sanchez-Zapata, J.; Benitez, J.; Lobon, M.; Camina, A.; Lekuona, J.; Montelio, E.; Donazar, J. (2010). The precautionary principle and wind-farm planning: data scarcity does not imply absence of effects. Biological Conservation, 143(8), 1829-1830.
Abstract: 

Scientific discussions such as that raised by Janss et al. (2010) in relation to our paper (Carrete et al., 2009) help to clarify issues in the field of wind energy planning, thus relegating non-technical issues that can potentially contaminate the debate. Janss et al. (2010) recognize the value of our work as the first large-scale assessment of wind farms on the population viability of an endangered species. However, these authors argue that (1) wind-farms in Andalusia (SE Spain) have been carefully planned, with wind-farm locations chosen on the basis of previous risk assessment studies (RAS), and (2) the mortality rate of Egyptian vultures used in our paper to develop the PVA analysis is a local phenomenon that cannot be extrapolated to other areas of Spain. We will try to briefly clarify these points, showing that they are based on outdated information suggesting that results and conclusions brought forth in our paper remain valid.

Find Tethys on InstagramFind Tethys on FacebookFind Tethys on Twitter
 
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.